A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on the Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly in a delicate coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waist-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute can be a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is called meticulous in his evaluation of planning paperwork, maps, and problems attached to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by concern for environmental security and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting instead that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair simply endeavoring to develop a relatives residence in accordance While using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that each one will work are performed dependant on Qualified information and accredited ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to change the underlying details.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly widespread. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to figure out whether the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and whether Paul Feely accountant any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other lengthy after the lawful charges are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design is effective at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.